The Big Picture
- Collider’s Perri Nemiroff talks
Blink Twice
spoilers with Channing Tatum and Naomi Ackie. - The two discuss the cannibalism storyline in an early draft of the screenplay, and Tatum breaks down his approach to that unforgettable “I’m sorry” scene.
- Tatum also teases Gambit’s future in the MCU, and Ackie discusses her experience working with Bong Joon-ho on
Mickey 17
.
[Editor’s note: The following contains spoilers for Blink Twice.]ZoĆ« Kravitzās Blink Twice rocks a top-tier ensemble led by two true powerhouse performers ā Channing Tatum and Naomi Ackie. Ackie leads the film as Frida, a cocktail waitress who gets the opportunity of her dreams, the chance to join tech billionaire Slater King (Tatum) and his friends on a getaway to his private island. While there, she indulges in limitless food, drink, pool time, and parties. Itās all utter perfection ā until itās not.
Ultimately, Frida comes to suspect something isnāt quite right with Slater and his island, and sheās right. She discovers heās using a flower indigenous to the island to wipe out the womenās memories, and the only antidote is snake venom. Courtesy of that venom, they learn Slater and his friends have been using a flower-made perfume to cover up a string of sexual assaults. When their scheme is exposed, a bloody massacre ensues. Frida survives and opts to give Slater a taste of his own medicine. She fills his vape with the perfume and makes herself the new CEO of his company.
With Blink Twice now playing in theaters nationwide, I got the chance to sit down with Tatum and Ackie to have a spoiler-filled chat about the making of the movie. The two discussed some of the biggest changes made while taking the story from script to screen, including some cut cannibalism, Tatumās breathtaking āIām sorryā scene, and loads more! You can hear it all straight from the duo in the video at the top of this article, or you can read the conversation in transcript form below.
āBlink Twiceā Was Originally a Cannibalism Story
“It goes full Lord of the Flies.”
PERRI NEMIROFF: I’ve heard a lot about how much the story has evolved over the years. Can you each tell me the biggest difference in the character you read on the page in the first draft you saw and who they became in the final film?
CHANNING TATUM: Well, I read way earlier scripts than she had. I mean, look, the first script literally had cannibalism.
NAOMI ACKIE: [Laughs] I wish I had read this!
TATUM: It was crazy. The women ā it goes full Lord of the Flies sort of situation. It was like an indigenous tribe situation. It was a wild. It was a wild, wild swing. That’s what was so cool about it in a way because you could just tell that this was someone that was just like, āI love movies and I love creating.ā She was like, āI have all of these options that we could do, and I wanna find what movie I want this to be.ā I was like, āThis is crazy. This is a crazy script. I know it’s important. I know what you’re saying and what you’re doing is important, so let’s keep working on it.ā I probably would have still done the cannibalism version. [Laughs]
ACKIE: Listen, Iām not mad at it! [Laughs]
TATUM: I probably would have and it would have been like, āEh, whatever. Letās send it.ā
ACKIE: āI guess Iām getting eaten.ā
Anything specific for Frida?
TATUM: I feel like there was a tone that you guys were doing that ultimately was confusing.
ACKIE: Yeah, basically Frida was more manipulative than comes across now.
TATUM: Basically, you’re almost at times going, āIs she a bad guy? Is she the one thatās doing all this?ā It was really interesting and cool, but I think it was just too confusing.
ACKIE: We were playing around with this idea of her putting on loads of different faces for different people and stuff like that. And I agree, what is the film now feels a lot clearer for the audience.
I love hearing about stuff like this because where you all land with tone and vibe is so pitch-perfect, and when you’re doing a genre mash-up, if that tone isn’t pitch-perfect, it just doesn’t work.
ACKIE: You just lose it. That’s a cool way of saying it, actually ā a genre mash-up.
TATUM: I agree.
I’ve also heard a lot about how specific ZoĆ« was with what she wanted, but she also gave you some freedom and room to play, so which seen would you say evolved the most from script to screen based on what you found on set?
TATUM: For me, the last scene.
ACKIE: The last scene, yeah.
TATUM: It wasn’t written like that until pretty much two days before.
Oh, I need to know everything about that scene.
TATUM: We really didn’t know how to do it. I ain’t gonna lie.
ACKIE: We had shot it before, hadnāt we? I feel like we shot a version of it.
TATUM: Yeah, we shot a version of it, and it was going in that direction, and then we just put on more to it in a way. It was going in the right direction, but we didn’t finish it. We didn’t land the plane, I don’t think. But we were, for a long time, trying to figure out, āHow do we justify this man?ā Usually, at the end of these types of movies, it’s like some long speech of why he’s doing all this and justifying himself, and mustache-twirling of, āIs he trying to take over the world or some bullshit?ā It really was ZoĆ« to be like, āTake it in and make it about something really small and emotional for him.ā It was brilliant, and that was all her idea.
Channing Tatum Explains His Approach to āBlink Twiceās Incredible āIām Sorryā Scene
I have to follow up on that briefly. The āIām sorryā part is utterly brilliant. Itās one of my favorite performance beats of yours. When you’re doing something like that and the emotion has to change throughout a single shot, are you mapping it out very specifically, or is it more about being in the moment?
TATUM: I think both, because it’s a long monologue, essentially, but there is interaction, so it’s not just a speech or something. I do map what’s making me talk about the things that I’m talking about, but I don’t really map the emotion. It’s like, if you try to cry, you’re not gonna cry. [Laughs]
ACKIE: Youāre in trouble. [Laughs]
TATUM: But yeah, I think for me, I can’t do that. You’re so in control of that. It seems like it. She’ll just be like, āJust give me a minute,ā and then the next thing you know, she just comes back and I’m like, āGoddamn, how did you do that?ā [Laughs]
ACKIE: Sometimes it’s tricks like just staring at a light, and then hyperventilating for a long time.
TATUM: Weāre gonna have a conversation about that.
My trick would be to touch an animal I’m allergic to and then rub my eyes.
TATUM: I don’t even have that. I wish I was allergic to [something]. Imagine if they were like, āYou win an Oscar for your allergies.ā
That’s the only way Iām winning an Oscar!
Naomi, how about for you? A scene that evolved the most on the spot?
ACKIE: It wasn’t scenes for me. There was an evolution of character, but I also feel like that happened in post-production. I actually think it was a reverse for me. Like, we were throwing everything.
TATUM: Did the conversation between you and Sarah (Adria Arjona), when you guys were figuring it out ā¦
ACKIE: Oh yeah, that did change. That did change.
TATUM: It was kind of serious.
ACKIE: It was very serious and it didn’t have that tone, that switch-up halfway through.
TATUM: It shifts tonally to be almost funny and fun when itās dire.
ACKIE: When they’re like, āOh, you didn’t know? Oh my god!ā
TATUM: It was brilliant.
ACKIE: But overall, I think it was about throwing as much as possible, as many different versions of Frida, and then ZoĆ« fixed together what she wanted. I think she’s a master genius at that, and we just kind of went with that. I can’t think of any real, real, specific one. I think Channingās one is the best example of that.
Putting it together the way she did is really next-level stuff.
ACKIE: A puzzle!
I have to wind down with you both. It’s breaking my heart to rip myself away from Blink Twice, but I have to ask about two other projects.
Where Is Gambit at the End of ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’?
“Thereās something that’s happening in that moment that maybe no one knows yet.”
Channing, you know where I’m going. I have to ask about Deadpool & Wolverine. You were delightful in that movie. I was grinning big every time you popped up on screen. For folks who stayed through the post-credits, it is revealed that Gambit is alive. Where do you think he is at the end of the movie, in The Void or in his own timeline?
TATUM: I think at that moment, if I had to guess, he’s definitely still in The Void, but thereās something that’s happening in that moment that maybe no one knows yet.
ACKIE: Sequel.
TATUM: And again, you never know. You never know. I mean, literally, I could never be in another Marvel movie again and it wouldn’t surprise me because I’ve had it in my hand before and it’s gone away. Iām always grain-of-salting it, but I’m hoping that Kevin [Feige] will allow me in. [Laughs]
ACKIE: Sequel!
I take great pride in manifesting things during interviews.
Naomi Ackie Teases Bong Joon-ho’s ‘Mickey 17’
The long-awaited film is set to hit theaters on January 31, 2025.
Naomi, I have a quick one for you, too, because Mickey 17 is obviously a highly anticipated one for me. Bong Joon-ho is an absolute master. Can you tell me something he did making that movie that’s one-of-a-kind him, that no other director could have brought to life quite like he does?
ACKIE: I love working with him. I guess the way he plots out a scene ā you never do a master, and I’ve never done that before. And itās this really cool thing he does with storyboarding that we were all panicking over, but he storyboards everything, and you shoot it shot-for-shot for the scene, and itās a magical way to make a movie.
I’m excited.
ACKIE: Iām so excited, too! I havenāt seen it.
Blink Twice is now in theaters. Find showtimes below: